A Presidential Candidate – Hillary Clinton

Comments | 12

• Submitted by Vidda on April 13, 2015 at 7:07 am

  More pretzeldential bullshit

  “Everyday is an adjective that means commonplace, ordinary, or normal.”

  Log in to Reply
• Submitted by SteveJD on April 23, 2015 at 5:14 pm

  So many scandals, where does it end?

  From The New York Times:

  Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation as Russians Pressed for Control of Uranium Company

  As the Russian atomic energy agency gradually took charge of a company that controls one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States, a stream of cash made its way to the former president’s charitable organization.

  http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-flowed-to-clinton-foundation-as-russians-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mwrsm=Email

  Log in to Reply
  • Submitted by cgrotke on April 24, 2015 at 7:52 am

    The Presidential Lineup

    Rather than debates, this time around the Democrats and Republicans should just hold police lineups.

    “Pick your candidate from the six against the wall.”

    Log in to Reply
    • Submitted by Vidda on April 24, 2015 at 8:45 am

      Vous avez un esprit plutôt drôle, Monsieur

      A D&R police lineup! lol! I love it. Now that is good community policing.

      Log in to Reply
      • Submitted by Rosa Bonheur on April 24, 2015 at 9:41 am

        I would be very cautious

        I would be very cautious about taking any information obtained via James Schweitzer as the unvarnished truth The New York Times has admitted that they gained access to his as yet unpublished book for their article. Here are some reasons they probably should have done their own work. Schweitzer is funded by the Koch brothers and has worked for Breitbart in the past. He is a known Republican operative who has a problem with the truth. If anyone would like more information about him here are some articles with information that can be verified. While some of his information may be factually based there is definitely a spin being put into place here. Paid for by the Koch brothers. A little caution and knowledge about the source here might be advised.
        http://mediamatters.org/research/2015/04/20/clinton-cash-author-peter-schweizers-long-histo/203209 http://talkingpointsmemo.com/fivepoints/peter-schweizer-clinton-cash-5-points

        Log in to Reply
        • Submitted by Vidda on April 24, 2015 at 10:14 am

          DeepDigger.org ?

          Rosa, you never cease to amaze me. Maybe have your own blog?
        • Submitted by Rosa Bonheur on April 24, 2015 at 12:17 pm

          I speed read . . . a lot. One

          I speed read . . . a lot. One other point. We are talking about donations to a charitable organization which by all accounts has done a lot of good. Hillary is expected to do full disclosure and rightly so. However, you have a situation where many who use this unreleased book as a basis for calling into question Clintons donations to the foundation are also firm believers and adherents to Citizens United and do not release any information about their own funding sources. Let me see, how do you spell hypocrisy? Oh yeah, B O E H N E R E T A L. Does the author of this book adhere to his own principles and do full disclosure as to just how much the Koch brothers have contributed to his work on this book. Just how much money have they donated to his “Franklin Fund.” Read the Talking Points Memo Point 5.
        • Submitted by AlanF on April 24, 2015 at 12:22 pm

          The Scandal Queen

          Her campaign has barely begun and already she’s up to her neck in scandals. The mere thought of her being our President is nauseating. We need a person of reputable character, an honest person that tells the truth, respects the Constitution and loves this country and her people. We haven’t had those traits in our leader for last 6½ years. How refreshing that would be. What we don’t need is a scandal plagued elder with virtually no real accomplishments to speak of, who puts oneself above the law. Did I forget to mention greed. We can and must do better than H., even if it’s an honest center left Democrat.
        • Submitted by cgrotke on April 24, 2015 at 12:29 pm

          Clinton-Bush 2016!

          “We haven’t had those traits in our leader for last 6½ years.”

          Um, I’d say more like the last 180 years, but certainly not since 2000.
        • Submitted by Rosa Bonheur on April 24, 2015 at 12:36 pm

          Scandal Secret Money Being Spent to Derail a Legitimate Campaign

          First of all AlanF the last thing you would be pleased with would be a left of center Democrat. So let’s just get past that and could I suggest that you perhaps drop the talking points. The only reason she is “up to her neck in scandals” is because of money being poured into the campaign quietly and secretly by the Koch brothers et al to smear her. I would ask you to clearly and succinctly define one “scandal” backed up by verifiable information that she is up to her neck in. And do note that I said verifiable but I’ll also add not funded by a Koch supported think tank or group or individual. Feel free . . . if you manage I’ll be impressed but I doubt it can be done. The only scandal here is how early the secret money is being funneled in what will prove to be a futile attempt to detail her campaign.
        • Submitted by SteveJD on April 24, 2015 at 1:27 pm

          Retreads

          She can’t get derailed, she already owes folks some big favors! The Clintons always just shrug it off and continue on, there is a long list. I was amazed to learn that Chelsea’s net worth is far higher then some small countries, 15 mm was a number batted around on the radio, maybe someone can confirm this, also just closed on a 10 mm home. But hey, they earned it, right?? But realistically, the whole family doesn’t reflect anyone’s values other the their own and certainly not presidential. Retreads at best, offer up something fresh and new!
        • Submitted by Rosa Bonheur on April 24, 2015 at 1:37 pm

          Who would you consider

          Who would you consider Presidential SteveJD. Just 2 names if you will.