WHAT IS YOUR CRITERIA FOR DEBATE EXCLUSION?
Wed, Aug 31 at 8:49 AM
To: The Necrason Group
RE: report by Vtdigger.org (which reports on campaign activity of major party candidates to the exclusion of most others while claiming to be a non-profit rather than a political action committee promoting major parties)
WHAT IS YOUR CRITERIA FOR DEBATE EXCLUSION? DO YOUR CLIENTS KNOW YOU APPEAR TO BE ACTING AS A POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE IN CONJUNCTION WITH REPORTING BY VTDIGGER.ORG TO ACT AS A POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE TO PROMOTE MAJOR
PARTY CANDIDTES WHILE EXCLUDING ALL OTHERS?
WHAT IS YOUR DEBATE CRITERIA?
HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT YOUR WORK TO EXCLUDE CANDIDATES AND HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT YOUR POLICY OF EXTREME LACK OF
INCLUSION?
DO YOU FEEL YOUR WORK TO EXCLUDE CANDIDATES FALLS UNDER ANY HATE CRIME LAWS?
ARE ALL OF THE ENTITIES LISTED AS YOUR CLIENTS IN CONSPIRACY WITH YOU TO EXCLUDE CANDIDATES FROM DEBATES?
ARE ALL OF THE ENTITIES LISTED AS YOUR CLIENTS HATEFUL AND HATING OF NON-MAJOR PARTY CANDIDATES?
VTDigger launches general election debates with US Senate event in Manchester on Sept. 8
“The debate will feature Republican nominee Gerald Malloy, a businessman and veteran of the U.S. Army, and Democrat Peter Welch, a member of the U.S. House. The two are competing for the seat being vacated by retiring U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.”
This debate is sponsored by the Necrason Group.
NECRASON GROUP
“In a recent survey of registered lobbyists, Necrason Group was named the Top Firm, and Adam Necrason Top Lobbyist.”
https://www.necrasongroup.com/record/
Montpelier, Vermont
33 Court Street
802-223-9988
teo@necrasongroup.com
baruzzi@necrasongroup.com
milly@necrasongroup.com
amy@necrasondgroup.com
NECRASON GROUP CLIENTS:
COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Vermont Housing and Conservation Coalition (VHCC)
Vermont Association of Planning and Development Agencies (VAPDA)
Preservation Trust of Vermont (PTV) /Downtown Directors Coalition
Vermont Solid Waste District Managers’ Association (SWDMA)
Vermont Land Trust (VLT)
Vermont Affordable Housing Coalition (VAHC)
Downtown Alliance
HEALTH CARE & EDUCATION
The University of Vermont Health Network (UVMHN)
Planned Parenthood of Northern New England (PPNNE)
American Heart Association, Vermont Chapter
Vermont Acupuncture Association (VTAA)
Let’s Grow Kids (LGK)
Vermont State College (VSC)
Vermont Head Start Association
Vermont Law School (VLS)
LABOR
Vermont National Education Association (VT – NEA)
United Nurses and Allied Professionals (UNAP)
Vermont Building & Constructions Trades Council
BUSINESS
Association of Vermont Credit Unions (AVCU)
Vermont Brewers Association (VBA)
Comcast
Optum
Personal Care Products Council (PCPC)
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT
Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC) / Efficiency Vermont (EVT)
Renewable Energy Vermont (REV)
Forest Partnership
Climate Coalition
Vermont Natural Resources Council (VNRC)
The Nature Conservancy – Vermont Chapter (TNC)
EQUAL JUSTICE, CONSUMER PROTECTION & CIVIL RIGHTS
Vermont Association for Justice (VTAJ)
American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont (ACLU)
Patient Choices Vermont (PCV)
Everytown For Gun Safety
Decriminalize Sex Work (DSW)
Community of Vermont Elders (COVE)
Sentencing Project
Cris Ericson
879 Church Street
Chester, Vermont 05143
http://crisericson.com
(802)875-4038
Emily Peyton
To: Cris Ericson
Wed, Aug 31 at 10:38 AM
It most certainly is a hate crime against the people.
It is tampering with elections to deprive the people of their rightful choices, that they put on the ballot, and done so by willful design, collaboration,
or even conspiracy to affect the outcome of an election.
It is a violation of the VT constitution article 7 and 8
I will highlight here:
Article 7. [Government for the people; they may change it]
That government is, or ought to be, instituted for the common benefit,
protection, and security of the people, nation, or community,
and not for the particular emolument or advantage of any single person,
family, or set of persons, who are a part only of that community;
and that the community hath an indubitable, unalienable,
and indefeasible right, to reform or alter government,
in such manner as shall be, by that community,
judged most conducive to the public weal.
Article 8. [Elections to be free and pure; rights of voters therein]
That all elections ought to be free and without corruption,
and that all voters, having a sufficient, evident, common interest with,
and attachment to the community, have a right to elect officers,
and be elected into office,
agreeably to the regulations made in this constitution.
Thank you for your work Cris
Freedom and Unity
Emily Peyton
Cell Phone: 802 579 5524
PO Box 821, Putney Vt 05346
www.emilypeyton.com
Finalized candidate list posted! Do we have someone too young on the ballot again?
https://sos.vermont.gov/elections/election-info-resources/candidates/
2022 General Election Candidate Listing
There are 8 candidates for United States Senator listed,
and one of them is Natasha Diamondstone-Kohout.
Does anyone know how old she is?
FROM VERMONT SEC. OF STATE ELECTIONS DIV:
Isabelle, JP
To: Cris Ericson
Tue, Aug 30 at 8:16 AM
I don’t know how old she is but it is akin
to the Ethan Sonnerborn situation a few years ago.
Though a person may not be old enough
to serve, they can still run for the office.
We don’t have the authority
to remove someone from the ballot.
JP Isabelle (he/him)
JD- VLS 2011 Elections Administrator
Vermont Office of the Secretary of State
128 State Street, Montpelier, VT 05633
Phone: 802-828-2304 (Direct)
https://sos.vermont.gov/elections
My complaint:
If Natasha Diamondstone-Kohout, a candidate for U.S. Senator,
is not of the legal age to be voted into office,
(not age 30 and will not be age 30 in January 2023),
then is every VOTE for her a way the Vermont Secretary of State
is conspiring to DILUTE the vote count for other candidates?
Is the Vermont Secretary of State Jim Condos intent on
preventing votes from being given effect in an election?
GOOGLE SEARCH RESULT:
Malfeasance by election officials acting “under color of
law” by performing such acts as diluting valid ballots with
invalid ones (ballot-box stuffing), rendering false
tabulations of votes, or preventing valid voter registrations
or votes from being given effect in any election, federal
or non-federal (18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242), as well as in
elections in which federal candidates are on the ballot (52
U.S.C. §§ 10307(c), 10307(e), 20511(2))