Proof US Allies Saudi Arabia & Qatar Fund & Equip ISIS All Along Not An Election Issue

by jay janson | Op/Ed | 1518 Views

Comments | 6

  • Submitted by Justintimefortheapocalypse on November 1, 2016 at 6:17 am

    Good read.

    Real talk.

  • Submitted by Vidda on November 1, 2016 at 8:10 am

    Frighten Who??

    Hey Jan

    Because your articles are of super length, even if readers were to flip to your articles, there is not a good chance that everyone will read them in their entirety.
    This article, for instance, is 9 pages and 6,555 words long!

    Moreover, your blogspot website > http://prosecuteuscrimesagainsthumanitynow.blogspot.com/ is extremely long and, worse, unreadable without googles with special filtering lens. The light text with pink and purple backgrounds almost makes your blog useless.

    At the bottom of this blog, the “FULL LIST OF CELEBRITIES AND ORGANIZATIONS CALLING FOR PROSECUTION OF US CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY NOW“ is pretty lightweight, Noam Chomsky, notwithstanding.

    And, is your stated “goal” (mission) really to “FRIGHTEN WITH PROSECUTION ANYONE CALLING FOR OR FOMENTING COVERT VIOLENCE OR MILITARY ATTACK ON OR IN AN OTHER NATION IN VIOLATION OF INTERNATIONAL/NATIONAL LAWS SUCH AS NUREMBERG PRINCIPLE #6 CRIMES AGAINST PEACE…”???

    Are you kidding?

    • Submitted by Justintimefortheapocalypse on November 1, 2016 at 12:06 pm

      Everyone's a critic.

      Just take it for what it’s worth, there is a lot of good information within.

      • Submitted by Vidda on November 1, 2016 at 3:07 pm

        More than a critic

        Oh, I’m more than merely a critic. I’ve spoken with Jay several times by phone and have followed him articles which I usually read in full. Moreover, you may be a longtime reader on this site, but your name is new to me, although, someone with the login handle, “Justintimefortheapocalypse” … isn’t someone I’d take too seriously, unless you mean it in jest.

        My comments stand: you want people to read your stuff – make it accessible – concision is worth its weight in gold.

        • Submitted by Justintimefortheapocalypse on November 2, 2016 at 7:28 am

          Thanks.

          Your first reply was condescending and rude. You even went as far as to critique the font and layout of this persons blog. So what if the article is long winded and has multiple typos, it’s still interesting. I’m just suggesting you appreciate the value in the article and not nitpick. If you have advice for the author maybe you should give it to he/she privately and not try to ridicule them publicly through the comment section.

          • Submitted by Vidda on November 2, 2016 at 9:17 am

            No thanks.

            This comment section is open-ended and author driven. However you may feel about my comments is of no concern to me unless my comments are a personal and harsh attack against someone. My comments were not.

            It’s easy for you to throw around terms like “condescending and rude” about my comments. That doesn’t mean they were. If I had wanted to be condescending and rude on here I would have answered you quite differently.

            This is a “public” forum. I can assure you I will not be contacting anyone “privately” to comment on their article or any comments to satisfy your need to read only what pleases you.

Leave a Reply