In the unfinished business of what happened on September 11, 2001 lay the questions raising doubts about the official story. During the 13 years after the attacks, the 9/11 memorials have centered on creating a status quo of remembering the heroes, volunteers and victims who lost their lives that day.
And like many remembrances, there is a blind spot that blocks out the other side of the story. By their nature, memorials need to be one-sided. There can be no doubt as to why people commemorate war memorials. In our pride and blind patriotism, we would not believe that the 9/11 attacks were perpetrated from within and without.
The people who died that day were not victims of terrorism but murder victims. As such, by midday the attack sites should have been treated as crime scenes. In forensic analysis a crime scene is sealed off to prevent contamination of evidentiary materials. The crime scene is best examined when you leave the pieces where they lay. This allows for a reconstruction to help determine what actually happened. Evidence is gathered and put through scientific techniques to investigate the crime.
Instead, the authorities immediately began a “clean up” of the sites, abandoning any attempt to complete a methodical investigation. The ‘cover up’ had already begun.
Moreover, even before the dust settled the emotional patriotic memorializing had begun. Overnight, massive commercial ventures of selling 9/11 had begun. Sales of flags, lapel pins, monuments and crosses won the day. Compensation, law suits and insurance settlements reached obscene levels. Commercial news stations thrived on the advertising dollars behind the oft-titled “War on Terror.” To this day, in any novelty shop in New York City can be found all manner of 9/11 memorabilia.
Yet, not enough Americans have wanted to ask even some basic questions. How is it possible to pulverize in ten seconds three of the largest skyscrapers in the world? Did inside covert intelligence civilian and government high level operatives use their advance surveillance information to piggyback on foreign low level plans to hide their own plans to execute a False Flag ops? Why did the Congress approve a 100 million dollar investigation of Clinton’s sex life, yet authorize a paltry 4 million dollars to belatedly investigate the truth of what happened on 9/11?
My own past familiarity with the World Trade Towers is a primary link to my doubting the official report. What happened to the Towers is germane to all that happened that day. Establish what was behind the structural demolition that ‘pulverized’ Towers 1, 2 and 7 and you will establish the relevancy, motives and the culpability of the mixed brew of low-tech/high-tech interested parties with the powers to really mastermind the attacks.
As Sherlock Holmes would say, “When you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
Vidda Crochetta
Brattleboro
http://www.reformer.com/letterstotheeditor/ci_26463206/letter-box
Letter Box POSTED: 09/04/2014 03:00:00 AM EDT
13 years later….
More Kool Aid?
Another well written missive, Vidda, one which will surely wrinkle a few hairs. I really think anyone who believes the ‘official’ story 100% has just had waaaaaay too much of the Kool Aid for far too long…
6 Reasons To Question and Investigate 9/11 on the 13th Anniversary | Ben Swann Truth In Media
Not a collapse
Thanks Joe! The link you provided is quite useful.
It touches on many points including the obviousness of the visual impact of certainty in seeing 3 towers go down with demolition.
Buildings that collapse, even in the worst case fires, are not “pulverized” in 10 seconds into dust and debris bits, and, collapsed buildings do not “fall neatly into their footprint” the way those 3 towers uniformly came down.
Not only do collapsed buildings “pancake,” but, because of variable weight loads on each separate floor, collapsed buildings tend to go down on a “sliding” scale. They literally slide right into one or more surrounding areas of least resistance.
In a true collapse, those 3 towers should have caused far more widescale extensive damage than they did. But Towers 4, 5, and 6 in the same plaza were damaged, but still standing.
I am not a trained engineer but I stand behind every word I’ve ever written about the Towers, so I appreciate hearing that you and some people can see it with a similar clarity.
Finding out
If we ever find out what really happened on 9/11 (Highly unlikely), we will know what’s really going on in the world.
Hint: It’s not what you read in the newspapers or see on TV.
Remember
…
Planned from abroad, with complicity from the inside
(NYTimes) President François Hollande, speaking Saturday from the Élysée Palace, said the attacks were “prepared, organized and planned from abroad, with complicity from the inside.”
Attacked from within and without…
Sound familiar?
14 years later
Far be it to from me to not make a plug.
Likely the world’s most recognized expert related to WTC “building collapses” is coming to Brattleboro to speak tommorow night (7PM) at the Hooker Dunham.
So I will … Richard Gage — founder Architects and Engieers fo 9/11 Truth — 7PM Hooker Dunham Theater 11/15
Unfinished Business From 9/11
Unfinished Business From 9/11
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD APRIL 22, 2016
(NYTimes) Former Senator Bob Graham, who was a co-chairman of the 2002 joint congressional inquiry into the attacks, has long claimed there is evidence of complicity by institutions and people beyond the 19 terrorists.
Full Text: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/22/opinion/unfinished-business-from-9-11.html?action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=opinion-c-col-left-region®ion=opinion-c-col-left-region&WT.nav=opinion-c-col-left-region&_r=0