ACT 46 STUDY COMMITTEE
Representing the Brattleboro Town School District, Dummerston Town School District, Guilford Town School District, Putney Town School District, and the Vernon Town School District
http://www.wssu.k12.vt.us
NOTICE OF MEETING
The Act 46 Study Committee will meet at 6:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 30, 2015 at the Academy School.
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER – 6:00 p.m. – Alice Laughlin, Committee Chair
II. REVIEW, PRIORITIZE AND ESTABLISH DESIRED OUTCOMES FOR MEETING BY CHAIRPERSON
III. REVIEW COMMITTEE MEMBER ROLES AND PUBLIC COMMENTS BY CHAIRPERSON
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – December 17, 2015
V. RECOGNITION OF GROUPS AND/OR INDIVIDUALS
VI. UPDATE ON PROGRAMMING AND FINANCES
Expanded Program Opportunities
Review of Potential Cost Savings
Review Financial Models
Update on Possible Union District Board Make Up
Review of School Advisory Groups
Update on School Choice Issue
VII. REVIEW COMPILED QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS, THEIR LOCAL BOARDS, AND THEIR COMMUNITIES AND DETERMINE POSSIBLE WORK GROUPS
VIII. UPDATE ON WEBSITE AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
IX. FUTURE MEETINGS, DISCUSSIONS
X. ADJOURNMENT
….
Brattleboro Town School District, Dummerston Town School District,
Guilford Town School District, Putney Town School District and Vernon Town School District
Act 46 Study Committee
Work Session Agenda, Minutes and Action Items for
Thursday, December 17, 2015 – 6:00-8:00 PM – Putney Central School
Present
Brattleboro: Kim Price**, David Schoales*, Jill Stahl Tyler*, Mark Truhan*
BUHS/ BAMS/WRCC: Ricky Davidson* and Ian Torrey*
Dummerston: Kristina Naylor** ***, Amy Wall* – Clerk
Guilford: Beth Bristol*, Trista Kerber**
Putney: Richard Glejzer**, Alice Laughlin* – Chair
Vernon: Matt Coombs*, Walter Breau**
* denotes voting member, ** denotes alternate voting member, *** denotes ex officio member
Also present
WSESU: Lyle Holiday – Curriculum & Assessment, Frank Rucker – Business Manager, Ron Stahley – Superintendent
Others: BCTV staff, members of the public, Rep. Mike Mrowicki
Committee Guidelines
1. Work sessions will start and end on time.
2. Work sessions will last 2 hours.
3. Members will give and receive with good intentions.
4. Members will follow “3 before me” as a guideline so all members have the opportunity to speak.
5. Members will conduct Committee business in front of the group.
6. Members will understand that silence on the part of another member does not imply agreement.
7. Members will site sources of evidence during discussion.
8. All members will be included in conversation and no side conversations will be conducted during the work session.
9. Members will stay on topic during discussions and will request the Clerk make note of additional topic(s) for future discussion.
10. Members will engage in the work at hand and administration will provide the space and support as needed to do so.
Agenda Items Led by
– Call to order and review agenda Alice Laughlin
– Review Committee member roles and public comments Alice
– Approve of minutes of previous work session Alice
– Recognize visitors and allow 5 minutes for public comment Alice
– Review first draft of worksheet Alice/Ron Stahley/Lyle Holiday
– Discuss District Property Alice/Ron Stahley
– Continued review of Accelerated Merger financial model Frank Rucker
– Review compiled questions from member, local boards and Alice
communities and determine possible work groups
– Schedule future meetings Alice/Ron
– Recommend agenda items for next meeting Alice
– Adjourn
Work Session Minutes:
Chair Alice Laughlin called the work session to order at 6:00 pm with a review of the agenda. On a motion made by Ricky Davidson, seconded by Kim Price and so voted, the minutes of the December 3 work session were accepted with the change of Ricky Davidson and Ian Torrey shown as representing BUHS/BAMS.
Alice invited members of the public and Rep. Mike Mrowicki to speak during the 5 minute public commentary.
Lyle Holiday shared the draft wording for Worksheet Items #1 and #3. Ricky Davidson, Jill Stahl Tyler and Amy Wall shared information on the work of the subcommittees that address board composition, proportionality and programming. An 11 member (based on census population data) or a 13 member board (11 member board with at an large member from Putney/Dummerston and Guilford/Vernon) was offered as possibilities. Ron Stahley will contact the VT AOE to confirm compliance with state law re: proportionality.
The committee discussed how the assets from each member district might be addressed. It was decided that a subgroup should delve into the details and report back to the committee with options.
The committee also discussed school choice. Matt Coombs shared that Vernon wants to retain school choice. Ron Stahley shared a letter from legislative council. Unlike other districts around the state offering choice, Vernon can retain school choice because it is provided in a state law. Since Vernon is the only known exception in VT, this allows WSESU members to consider Act 46 options. The committee agreed to uphold Vernon’s long standing school choice option for middle/high school students. Ron Stahley pointed out that this does not add additional expense as Vernon’s cost per student electing school choice cannot exceed the state average. This amount is less than BAMS/BUHS costs.
The committee revisited several topics. Ron Stahley clarified questions about the length of the school day among the member districts. The difference in the length of the school day is 5-0 minutes and is due bus schedules. Also, the role of the committee with respect to educational programming was revisited and clarified. In general, it is the responsibility of School boards (and in this case, the Study committee) to provide the vision for public education in their communities and to work with Central Office staff who develops programs and budgets to implement this vision.
Frank Rucker led a review of the Accelerated Merger Financial information using different inputs and household values. The committee will continue to look at this information at all future meetings along with Central Office staff.
Ron Stahley shared that grant money should be available soon. He stated that Diane Watson has been recommended as a consultant in the area who might help the Study Committee with its work. Ron will contact Diane to learn if she is available and will report back to the committee.
Alice Laughlin and Ron Stahley led a discussion of School Advisory Committees and their roles in a Unified District. Ricky Davidson shared his experiences as a member of the BUHS board. BUHS board members are required to sit on three committees. One of the committees he serves on is the BAMS committee. As an example of how a School Advisory Committee might work, Ricky gave the example of how the after school program at BAMS was developed by the collective efforts of the BAMS committee, principal, staff and town organizations. Kim Price shared her experience on a School Advisory group and will provide this information in a written summary at the next meeting.
Amy Wall advised that a page has been added to the WSESU website for the Act 46 Study Committee. Meeting agendas and approved minutes will be posted. She is compiling Act 46 information in a document that can be used as a reference by the committee and shared with the public. A draft will be sent to Alice over the weekend and distributed to the committee thereafter. Community engagement was discussed. Ron shared that Dummerston will be hosting a public forum on 12/8 and Frank will present financial information. Other boards will be doing the same in their communities.
The committee agreed that all financial questions should be directed to Alice Laughlin who will compile and forward them to Frank Rucker to address. The committee agreed that all other questions should be directed to Amy Wall who will compile them for the committee to address.
Future meetings are scheduled as follows:
– 12/29/15 from 6-8 pm – Committee work session at Academy School,
– 01/07/16 from 6-8 pm – Committee work session at Dummerston School,
– 01/21/16 from 6-8 pm – Committee work session at Putney Central School, and
– 01/29/16 from 6-8 pm – Committee work session at Academy School.
Agenda items for next meeting on 12/29/15 include:
– Continue review financial model data – Accelerated Merge
– Continue work on the Worksheet and clarify outstanding issues re: #9 and #10
– Review information on School Advisory Committees – roles, responsibilities, composition, etc.
– Review examples of costs savings and expenses
– Confirm Vernon’s school choice
– Confirm proportionality requirements for SD Board.
On a motion made by Kim Price, seconded by Mark Truhan and so voted, the work session ended at 8:03 pm.
Action Items before next meeting and Responsible party
– Review Act 46 information at http://education.vermont.gov/laws/2015/act-46 All
– Review Addison-Rutland SU website at arsu.org All
– Forward financial questions to Alice at alicelaughlin@rocketmail.com All
– Forward general questions to Amy Wall at amhbeg@gmail.com All
– Monitor Grant request to AOE Ron
– Compile financial questions and forward to Frank Alice
– Compile Committee member questions Amy
– Continue ongoing revision/additions to Act 46 FAQ Amy
– Inquire about availability of consultant Ron
– Ensure info is posted on Act 46 Study committee page on WSESU website Amy, Kim
– Provide written summary of School Advisory Committee experience Kim
– Confirm proportionality requirements with VT AOE for a SD Board Ron
– Coordinate and schedule working group for worksheet items 9 and 10 Alice
– Provide estimates of anticipated cost savings/expenses Frank
– Provide information on expanded program opportunities Ron/Lyle
– Confirm Vernon’s school choice Ron
Respectfully submitted, Amy Wall – Committee Clerk
Thank you ~ and help!
Thanks for this post! Is there anybody out there (just nod if you can hear me)who can break ACT 46 down plainly in condensed form? My research has been hurting my brain..
From what I can tell
Act 46 encourages and offers incentives for school districts to merge into larger, more regional organizations.
It’s optional, not required, but encouraged if it makes sense for a region.
Mandatory
The consolidation aspect of Act 46 is mandatory, and districts will eventually have compounding tax penalties if they fail to comply (by 2017 or 2018, I believe, districts that aren’t in compliance will face a 5-cent penalty on the school tax rate each year). If districts don’t comply voluntarily, the state will simply step in and submit their own consolidation plan for that district.
The method of compliance is optional, and will vary from district to district. Some districts will have to do very little, many will have to make significant changes.
Act 46 also includes a penalty for increased per pupil spending that is in addition to existing “excess” spending penalties under Act 68.
less local
I should have put “optional” in quotes. (More like “having a drivers license is optional”… )
It is true that there financial consequences for not going along with everyone else.
But you do as you please, go ahead, really… 🙂