"Dare to be naive." - Buckminster Fuller

User login

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 45 guests online.

Welcome to iBrattleboro!

Welcome to iBrattleboro!
It's a local news source by and for the people of Brattleboro, Vermont, published continually. You can get involved in this experiment in citizen journalism by submitting meeting results, news, events, stories, reviews, how-to's, recipes, places to go, things to do, or anything else important to Brattleboro. Or, just drop by to see what others have contributed.

Find iBrattleboro on:

 Twitter YouTube

Search the Archives

Ye Olde iBrattleboro Archive

Use the pulldown to choose desired number of results.


Search the first decade
of iBrattleboro archives
at Archive-It.org
Feb 20, 2003 to Feb 6, 2013

Lawsuit: Nobody Died at Sandy Hook

1 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Filed Against MSM For Staging Sandy Hook  

“After exhaustive research, the good news is that overwhelming evidence reveals that no children or teachers died at Sandy Hook two years ago. For relief, I have filed lawsuits against the media in US District Court in New Haven for Fraud and Terrorism. Here is an example of our abundant evidence, Exhibit D: The Connecticut State Police dash cams record no evacuation of children from school at critical moments:


 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rqcaaE6aFX8 —
Smoking Gun evidence no children died at Sandy Hook.”

More here: http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/1-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-filed-against-msm-for-staging-sandy-hook-massacre  


Comments | 32

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Link Removed by whom?

Smoking Gun evidence no children died at Sandy Hook.”

This link was working the other day. Sorry.


This is obscene.

This is obscene.


It absolutely is. I'm

It absolutely is. I'm disgusted that this kind of garbage is on here.


What, you'd prefer the continuation of lies here?

Why are you disgusted that "this kind of garbage is on here"? That's nothing compared to the deceptions of 9/11. But why should truth "disgust" you? I don't understand the mentality. Isn't it about time you grew up, you know, became an adult and stopped hiding your head in Big Daddy's groping arms and face truth head on? Big Daddy has some very serious disorders. And hiding only gets you further down into the cesspool, without your even knowing. The press tries to fool you too, they are traitors to democracy. You're just a toy to them. Time to start telling Big Daddy to take a hike. You love BD but he wants your mind.


KAlden is absolutely correct.

KAlden is absolutely correct. It is disgusting to put the parents of Sandy Hook who are probably barely hanging onto their sanity thorugh any of this conspiracy theory garbage. I can only hope this doesn't make it through the intertubes for them to see although some have already been repeated contacted abusively by a couple of these idiots. This lawsuit will be thrown out of court and correctly so. Anyone who puts garbage up like this with no concern about the wounds the parents have to bear has no shame and no conscience.


But there were no deaths.

Don't you get it? The parents should be relieved to see that their children weren't killed after all. There is nothing disgusting about discussion. How are we ever going to get anywhere if we cannot even discuss a subject? If you're disgusted, that's your prerogative, but we're going to get to the bottom of this and every other lie that's been told to keep the plebs in line. Are you suggesting that your sentiments are more important than finding out if this debacle really occurred?


Anyone who actually believes

Anyone who actually believes that there were no deaths at Sandy Hook is a very sick and perverse individual.


Anyone who actually believes

Anyone who actually believes everything our government tells us
is a very gullible, sick and perverse individual.


Not true

My mother in law is a therapist in the town next to Sandy Hook. There were deaths... horrible deaths that she by proxy also lives through.


I have no idea what your

I have no idea what your ridiculous comment is even about. If you want to add something intelligent and somewhat articulate to this thread please do. Conspiracy theories about the massacre of children are not worth reading about.
Nor are your ramblings


What is the point of posting

What is the point of posting this? It's really disturbing whatever the reason was. Does this echo your beliefs on this horrific event?


Why I posted this

I posted this because I have the optimism that maybe, just maybe these kids didn’t die. I don’t know that, nor maybe even believe that, Can I have hope?

I'd feel better if they didn't die, than if they did, no matter what.

As far as our illustrious government perpetrating a hoax, look at history. They have done it many, many times in the past. How many Americans, let alone Iraqis perished because of the proven hoax of “weapons of Mass destruction”? How many died in Viet Nam because of the hoax called “the Tonkin Gulf Incident”?

Here are ten top media and government hoaxes in recent history – lies and distortions that underscore how we truly are living in an age of universal deceit. This is not my list. It was compiled by Paul Joseph Watson
– Iraq had weapons of mass destruction
– Osama Bin Laden was killed in May 2011
– The drone program doesn’t exist
– The Federal Reserve is federal
– The unemployment rate is 7.7%
– Flu vaccines protect you against flu
– Fluoride is good for you
– The government is not preparing for civil unrest
– Democrats and Republicans represent two opposing parties
– There is a war on drugs
And you all remember Jessica Lynch


I think it's awesome what you're doing

I wish you every success. But we must remember, the just-us system is their domain, rigged entirely in their favor. No matter, exposure is what they shun. However we could have our own people's court online, completely doing away with the systems they impose. We need to develop the software. It's not that difficult. This has already started in such things as standing witness with apps like Cell411 which alerts friends during an emergency rather than depend on police: https://www.hackread.com/cell-411-smartphone-app-is-police-worst-nightmare/

The odds of getting a reasonable result would be higher if we were to simply toss a coin rather than wait for a deliberation from a judge in this system, who is highly invested in maintaining the status quo. But go for it, I support you in this effort.


Must be some sort of conspiracy I'm sure

Must be some sort of conspiracy Tomaidh. But in reality the link was removed by Youtube because they have a sense of decency unlike people who post garbage like this online. Man up and respond to people's queries Tomaidh. You posted this, you owe people an explanation as to why.


...you owe people an explanation as to why...?

Actually, this is not a debt site. He or any other author posting on this site owes nothing to anyone.

If garbage is in the eye of the beholder, then the person who is observing gets to decide what is garbage. I read somewhere that beauty doesn't exist on its own but is created by observers.

Rosa, you may or may not have the mind's eye of YouTube that allows you to know the reason why they removed the link. But even if you are just guessing to make it seem that YouTube shares the same sense of "decency" that you do, you are not required to woman-up and respond to people's queries of why you feel that way.

As of this writing there are 287 views of this tomaidh article. And, there may indeed be 287 "views" of the people who have read it so far.

But we know for sure, your view is 'one' of them.


Vidda,you're assuming that

Vidda,you're assuming that Rosa actually looked at the video. I share the same mind set that Rosa does; that this "conspiracy" bullshit about a horrendous day when 2 dozen children were murdered in cold blood is an obscenity and perverse.
I don't know if Rosa viewed the video. I did not look at it. The original headline of the post was enough to let me know that there was no good reason to read further. I do think it's odd that anyone would post something this outrageous and this offensive ( obviously not to everyone) without following through with a comment as to why they chose to "share" this. I will go so far as to say that I think throwing something this disturbing out there and then just sitting back to see the response is nothing but cowardly.


His modus operandi

Kris, I didn't think or assume Rosa saw the video. The "view" I was referring to was to her point of view (POV), which you obviously share. You or Rosa couldn't have looked at the video because Tom's first and only comment here wrote that the YouTube link was no longer working.

Moreover, I suspect that Tom is not nearly as emotionally involved with his post as you and Rosa seem to be. And, there is nothing cowardly about any of us who submit articles without explanation. We can post our articles to only generate a discussion if we want. The comments section is not necessarily there for the author who submitted the piece to join in.

If anything, if I am correct about this, his modus operandi worked perfectly.


Vidda, I frequently

Vidda, I frequently appreciate your posts and comments.And, I understand that posts are often submitted in order to garner discussion. More often than not the person who generates the post joins in the discussion. There is something quite different about putting up a post that asks a question or is of general interest seeking to start a conversation and posting something that not only diminishes and attempts to rob the families of their grief and any attempts they are making to move forward but eradicated the memories of classrooms of 6 and 7 year olds who were massacred by a mentally ill man who should not have had access to weapons.
As someone who has had a child die I can tell you that there is nothing more disgusting, more perverse, more immoral than disregarding the death of a child.
It's situations like this when I briefly wonder if freedom of speech is such a wonderful thing. I have no desire to continue this conversation. The whole thing has left me enraged and disgusted.


Thank you Kris and I feel the

Thank you Kris and I feel the same towards many of your comments.
I’m glad you brought up freedom of speech. I’m sure you’ll agree it was never meant to be a wonderful thing. Without unabridged freedom of speech there is no such thing.

I have noted that your objections largely parallel what Rosa has said about people posting 9/11 so-called conspiracy theories, “to start a conversation and posting something that not only diminishes and attempts to rob the families of their grief and any attempts they are making to move forward, etc.”

Tom chose “Rumors” as the section for his post. I wonder if he wouldn’t have been more forthcoming to reply to you or Rosa if you both hadn’t acted on your assumptions to tear right into him for posting a rumor. He might in fact actually agree with you both. But, civility goes both ways. You may never know now.


He can post this under Stupid

He can post this under Stupid Human Tricks for all I care. If you are emotionally removed enough to not see how shameful it is to use the grief of these parents and the deaths of their children as fodder for another conspiracy theory that is your burden to bear. I suppose in this age of "anything goes" on the internet it it also your right. But then it is the readers right to criticize and to expect some sort of reasonable explanation as to why you felt compelled to post something so heartless and trivial about such a sad and horrific event that forever changed so many families lives. I'm with KAlden on this one.


A Tin Man Can Feel

We’ve been through this before Rosa.

It’s a burden for you to bear, not me.

A tin man could feel the loss of children. Not just in this case, but thousands of cases where children are the victims from a variety of angles.

Moreover, from my standpoint I can feel the pain of an abused dog…the pain of a 90 year old…the harm done by the female holocaust. But, I wouldn’t single out children as some special case scenario, and my family knows that I love to be around children.

It isn’t that I’m not sensitive to plight of harm for anyone, I just don’t have to wear it on my damn sleeve like its some badge of honor for me to protect them from the big bad tomaidh’s in the world.

The people in Sandy Hook, just the families of 9/11, can take care of themselves. They don’t need you to abuse tomaidh, me or anyone else for their sake.

The problem with the sensationalism of the news is that they have an all too willing commercial audience in people like yourself who may not have enough to do in your daily activities, here a little closer to home.


You can attempt the cheap

You can attempt the cheap shots all you want Vidda. I'll speak in defense of those who have been harmed so terribly and you and Tomaidh can continue to play your little mind games with conspiracy theories with no regard to the feelings of those who have been damaged. I like my path much better than yours. And just a little FYI, the Sandy Hook families have been reaching out to others, asking for help and for support which they desperately need. But of course how would you know that since you can't seem to tear yourself away from your conspiracy web sites.



I think most people reading my comment would not see them as "cheap shots." But, one can find cheap shots in your comment(s).

I don't use conspiracy web sites. I have common sense and can discern things for myself. I also have never read, nor have any interest in a so-called conspiracy website about Sandy Hook.

Try to be accurate when making your "assertions" about me. After all, those "making assertions have the burden of showing that this is so"

Sandy Hook happened over three years ago, and I'm sure none of them will ever get over it. They may indeed, however, still be "reaching out to others, asking for help and for support which they desperately need."

But if you spent as much time in actually helping these people instead of a protracted mortal verbal combat with tomaidh and others, you'd be really doing something. Here, you are squandering good energy that could be put to better use, as you see it.


cheap shot?

"The problem with the sensationalism of the news is that they have an all too willing commercial audience in people like yourself who may not have enough to do in your daily activities, here a little closer to home." ~ Vidda

Now why would Rosa take that as a cheap shot, anyway? Or personal?

As our would-be scholar in residence has advised us, nothing that Vidda writes is personal. His having pointed out that "people like you" do not have much of a life, should not be taken as insulting. It is merely the impersonal observation of a highly-evolved individual.


Phony Chivalrous Attempt

Cheap shots are usually thought of as directed to a vulnerable, defenseless or unprepared person. Rosa is anything but defenseless.

And, Steven, so am I.

If you can't speak for yourself, you might consider that Rosa can take care of herself.


Dish it out...

Can't take it. Poor Vidda :-)



Steven, if you don't have anything of substance add, why don't you just move on? This has run its course.


Thanks for the back-up SK-B.

Thanks for the back-up SK-B. It appears you no longer can be crtiical of posts here. Or show kindness, re: the Chemtrail thread and your comments. You just can't post anything here on ibrattleboro anymore unless you run it past Vidda first…..and make sure he agrees with your train of thought. As for Vidda's barbed comments, I just consider the source.


Man up and respond

Please see my explanation above.
In short, hope springs eternal.
My hope is that nobody died, and there are no grieving parents.

You know from experience, that just because you see something on TV doesn't make it so.
I saw Colin Powell explaining that Iraq had weapons of Mass destruction.
Based on his testimony, we went to war.
Various scientific surveys of Iraqi deaths resulting from the first four years of the Iraq War estimated that between 151,000 to over one million Iraqis died as a result of conflict during this time. A later study, published in 2011, estimated that approximately 500,000 Iraqis had died as a result of the conflict since the invasion.
For troops in the U.S.-led multinational coalition, the death toll is carefully tracked and updated daily, and the names and photographs of those killed in action as well as in accidents have been published widely. A total of 4,491 U.S. service members were killed in Iraq between 2003 and 2014

In a speech before the World Affairs Council of Charlotte, NC, on April 7, 2006, President Bush stated that he "fully understood that the intelligence was wrong, and [he was] just as disappointed as everybody else" when U.S. troops failed to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq


So long and thanks for all the fish

ibrattleboro is becoming a joke.

Might as well allow the roboposts for Vi4*gaRa as they have a higher intellectual content.


Continued Ambiguity

The Sandy Hook Massacre: Continued Ambiguity and Augmented Realities

"A recent report notes that FBI crime statistics reflect no homicides occurred in Newtown, Connecticut throughout the year 2012."

I have no idea what really happened at Sandy Hook, but have talked with enough people who harbor misgivings about the official story to have some of my own. Reading this thread I'd like to hear more from Brandy's mother-in-law.


“what really happened” ... 571, 000 Results

I just typed in Google search 'only three words': “what really happened”

Wouldn't you know it, the first drop down line that came up said, “what really happened at Sandy Hook," showing "About 571, 000 results."


So, I went to the 5th page of links, then to the 10 page of links.

I probably should have done this first instead of wasting my time with SK-B and Rosa. If they had presented comments without their sanctimonious character attacks against the authors of the Sandy Hook and Chemtrails articles, we all might have intelligent discussions about these kinds of articles.


Upcoming Events

iBrattleboro Poll

The most influential (recent) President of the US is/was